Skip to main content

Infiltrators and expatriates

 When a prime minister ignites riots, delivers continuous hate speeches against Muslims, and claims that only Hindus can live while labeling Muslims as infiltrators, the situation becomes dire. This relentless propaganda against Muslims creates a hostile environment. Yet, many Hindus work and earn more than they deserve in Muslim countries without any hesitation. Despite this, Muslims, following the path of Islam where justice is denied to no one, even to their enemies, remain silent. The harsh reality is that not a single voice is raised against the hate mongers and the prime minister to stop spreading their venom.




If we look around, we can witness all of this firsthand. So where are humanity, justice, and truth? Everything could be resolved if people had the courage to speak up for justice. Astonishingly, those working in Muslim countries are even posting hateful and venomous content against Islam and the prophets, yet they remain free to work. On what basis does the RSS-aligned prime minister spew this verbal diarrhea of poison?


They have created a narrative where Muslims are seen as infiltrators and barbarians. Why don’t these narratives get debunked when these individuals are living and mingling with Muslims? History, books, and articles are all available to learn and understand the truth. Despite this, the pervasive Islamophobia, while benefiting from Muslim resources, is incredibly awkward. Even to destroy Muslim worship sites, resources were collected from Muslim countries. 

Modi’s campaign for a third term was marked by a relentless focus on divisive rhetoric and anti-Muslim sentiment. The BJP’s strategy hinged on portraying Muslims as “infiltrators” and “jihadis” and accusing the Congress and its leader Rahul Gandhi of pandering to Muslim interests at the expense of Hindus. This narrative was amplified through social media and public speeches, creating an atmosphere of fear and hostility.


Despite this aggressive communal strategy, the electorate’s response was mixed, with economic issues such as unemployment and inflation taking precedence for many voters.


The 2024 elections were marred by serious irregularities and a systemic failure of the Election Commission. Reports of Muslim names being removed from electoral rolls and instances of Muslims being prevented from voting highlighted the discrimination and disenfranchisement.


The Election Commission and judiciary failed to hold BJP leaders accountable for their hate speech, reflecting a broader capitulation of institutions meant to uphold justice and democratic principles. This failure to act against incitement and discrimination underscores the persistent threats to India's secular democracy.

Modi and his followers might not reflect on this, but those Hindus should look into themselves and question their consciences. There is too much hatred and too much greed. If they showed a minimum amount of justice to themselves, the world would be much better for all communities. It’s baffling why the much-hyped culture doesn't make them think to at least debunk the disinformation.


(Credits to various YouTube, scroll.in, deshbhakth, news laundry)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sudapi

 The term "sudapi" is described as it refers to a mindset or attitude characterized by standing up for justice and truth. Individuals with this mindset are committed to honesty and fairness, often advocating for what is right, even if it is difficult or unpopular. In India, various cultural, regional, or linguistic communities might have their own terms or expressions to describe such a mindset, but "sudapi" seems to be a specific term used to encapsulate this particular ethos. If this term is more commonly used in a particular region or among a specific group, it would be interesting to explore its roots and how it came to embody the values of truth and justice. It seems "sudapi" is used pejoratively by opponents to describe individuals who stand up for justice and truth, especially when others, including cultural and literary figures, remain silent. These "sudapis" voice out against atrocities and injustices, becoming a target of false accusati

Collective Efforts for a Better Society

 Social security and social responsibility represent a shared commitment to improving life for all, fostering a culture of unity and empathy. In this pursuit, an honest and just understanding of our society is vital. However, if we succumb to divisive influences, embrace hate, or become vehicles for propaganda, our collective efforts will be in vain. In our quest for a more harmonious world, let us remember that nurturing cohesiveness and empathy is essential. These values, coupled with an unwavering commitment to truth and justice, form the cornerstone of a just and equitable society. Conversely, embracing divisive narratives, false information, and hate-mongering only serves to undermine the very foundations of social security and responsibility. Ultimately, the path to a better future for all lies in our collective choice – to stand for unity, truth, and empathy or to be swayed by division, falsehoods, and hatred. The choice is ours, and it will determine the success of our shared e

A Conversation

 Person A: Hey, I've been hearing some concerning things about your recent actions. There are rumors that you've been spreading false narratives and deceiving the society. Can you explain what's going on? Person B (Cheater): Oh, come on, those are just rumors. You know how people love to talk. I'm just sharing alternative viewpoints and shedding light on hidden truths that the mainstream doesn't want you to know. Person A: Alternative viewpoints are one thing, but there's a fine line between that and spreading outright false information. I've seen evidence that suggests you've been manipulating facts to fit your narrative. Why would you do that? Person B: Look, the truth isn't always black and white. Sometimes you have to bend the facts a little to get people to see the bigger picture. The society has been blinded for too long by the established norms. I'm just trying to wake them up and make them question things. Person A: I understand the impor